|Topic: Anyone using Postgresql with quasi ISAM interface with complete success?
|Anyone using Postgresql with quasi ISAM interface with complete success?
on Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:31:14 -0700
Hi Folks, I am still sitting on the fence, waiting for some encouragement to move from Version 1.9 to Version 2.0. I have tried the evaluation and I cannot see any benefit yet to switch. I am a heavy user of ADS and I am still using the DBF table format without any problems. The quasi SQL works extremely well and provides all the requirements that we have. I can not even get the quasi ISAM in Postgresql to come even close in performance in Version 2.0. We tried all the dbfupsizing and found the overall performance to be horrendously slow, no matter what, or how the indexes were created. Frank at Alaska could not tell me why I should switch, maybe someone out there can convince me it would be a good idea to do so. I am open to ideas, Postgresql is a fine database system, I think it gets a bad rap with xbase++ 2.0. Love to hear from you. Regards to all Chris C. PS I have had no problems running 1.9 with Windows 11 so far, and that includes using the XbpHTMLViewer control. That was a surprise, as I had understood, that all instances of Internet Explorer had been removed from Windows 11. Apparently not yet. Chris C Chambers CTO Inca Business Systems Inc. https://incabiz.com https://chriscchambers.com