| Author | Topic: Hello |
|---|
 | Rodd Graham | Hello
on Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:10:50 -0500Just stopped in to say hello.
Rodd |
 | Pablo Botella | Re: Hello
on Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:16:35 +0200Hi Rodd,
> Just stopped in to say hello.
You are always welcome here, even if just to say hello
I wish you everything going well.
Regards,
Pablo Botella |
 | Boris Borzic | Re: Hello
on Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:46:02 +0200"Rodd Graham" <rgraham@grahamautomation.com> wrote in news:4c2c79fa
$7bd2404f$114f3@news.alaska-software.com:
> Just stopped in to say hello.
Longing for a simpler time?
We miss you, you're always welcome here!
Best regards,
Boris Borzic
http://xb2.net
http://sqlexpress.net
industrial strength Xbase++ development tools |
 | Rodd Graham | Re: Hello
on Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:09:17 -0500I think the 'simpler time' might have been 30 years ago when software had
less than 64k ram and networking required carrier tones.
Still maintaining the legacy Xbase++ app for my client as it is just too big
and complex to port within their budgetary constraints. Otherwise
freelancing in the VB6/.NET/Delphi arenas maintaining legagy projects.
Nevertheless, I do miss the smaller community associated with Xbase++...
How has it been going for all of you?
Seeing much progress in the Xbase++ development?
Rodd
<Boris Borzic> wrote in message
news:Xns9F27592CC7813SQLExpress@87.106.143.233...
> "Rodd Graham" <rgraham@grahamautomation.com> wrote in news:4c2c79fa
> $7bd2404f$114f3@news.alaska-software.com:
>
>> Just stopped in to say hello.
>
> Longing for a simpler time?
> We miss you, you're always welcome here!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Boris Borzic
>
> http://xb2.net
> http://sqlexpress.net
> industrial strength Xbase++ development tools |
 | Boris Borzic | Re: Hello
on Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:19:18 +0200"Rodd Graham" <rgraham@grahamautomation.com> wrote in
news:40ac469f$3c9627bb$14d11@news.alaska-software.com:
> I think the 'simpler time' might have been 30 years ago when software
> had less than 64k ram and networking required carrier tones.
I don't recall that being a simpler time . We were still learning, the
tools were not very good, and things kept changing too fast. There was
always a sense of insecurity.
> Still maintaining the legacy Xbase++ app for my client as it is just
> too big and complex to port within their budgetary constraints.
> Otherwise freelancing in the VB6/.NET/Delphi arenas maintaining legagy
> projects. Nevertheless, I do miss the smaller community associated
> with Xbase++...
Although some may see it as a drawback, the smaller community definitely
has it's advantages. For example, you know where to go in order to get
help.
> How has it been going for all of you?
> Seeing much progress in the Xbase++ development?
For me personally, things are great. I have a set of tools that I know
quite well, are very stable and I have some control over. I'm not wasting
time QA testing someone else's tools or learning how to do basic things.
I think one of the smartest decisions we made about 13 yrs ago was to not
use the Xbase++ GUI and database drivers (these were, and probably still
are, the most problematic components). The Xbase++ compiler is great
(multithreaded, simple, and compact). My applications are quite modern &
easy to install and maintain - just copy exe and dll's into a folder. No
need to install megabytes of runtime dependencies which then get modified
by windows update and no longer work exactly the same as before. Some
people call that progress, but then you are constantly chasing a dream.
I remember one of those ads in the old Clipper days with the programmer
wearing a Hawaiian shirt sitting on a beach. I have a picture of the ad
in my mind, but don't recall who the advertiser was.
Kind regards,
Boris Borzic
http://xb2.net
http://sqlexpress.net
industrial strength Xbase++ development tools |
 | Rodd Graham | Re: Hello
on Thu, 21 Jul 2011 02:44:34 -0500>> I think the 'simpler time' might have been 30 years ago when software
>> had less than 64k ram and networking required carrier tones.
>
> I don't recall that being a simpler time . We were still learning, the
> tools were not very good, and things kept changing too fast. There was
> always a sense of insecurity.
>
Yes, but the complexity was several magnitudes lower. Besides things are
still changing too fast except in the xBase++ world. Fortunately I think
VM's will ensure that legacy software can survive going forward. I was even
surprised a few years ago to find someone made a C64 emulator for Windows.
Showed my brother and he spent 16 hours straight reliving his childhood
playing 1980's video games.
>> How has it been going for all of you?
>> Seeing much progress in the Xbase++ development?
>
> For me personally, things are great. I have a set of tools that I know
> quite well, are very stable and I have some control over. I'm not wasting
> time QA testing someone else's tools or learning how to do basic things.
> I think one of the smartest decisions we made about 13 yrs ago was to not
> use the Xbase++ GUI and database drivers (these were, and probably still
> are, the most problematic components). The Xbase++ compiler is great
> (multithreaded, simple, and compact). My applications are quite modern &
> easy to install and maintain - just copy exe and dll's into a folder. No
> need to install megabytes of runtime dependencies which then get modified
> by windows update and no longer work exactly the same as before. Some
> people call that progress, but then you are constantly chasing a dream.
> I remember one of those ads in the old Clipper days with the programmer
> wearing a Hawaiian shirt sitting on a beach. I have a picture of the ad
> in my mind, but don't recall who the advertiser was.
FWIW, I am able to deliver COM applications by copy of dll/exe/manifest to
WinXPsp2 or better. Obviously .NET can also install by copy so long as the
underlying runtime is already there.
I assume you use HTML and XB2NET primarily for your user interface? SQL
Express for your database? About the same here as you know I use a
customized version of XB2NET and a homegrown ACE/ADSDBE/ORM combination.
The application I maintained has largely be reduced to a processing engine
that third parties are calling from .NET frontends. The trick was reverse
engineering the WSDL and SOAP from .NET to make it easy and transparent for
the clients.
Later,
Rodd |
 | Boris Borzic | Re: Hello
on Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:28:43 +0200"Rodd Graham" <rgraham@grahamautomation.com> wrote in
news:477f2ddd$5660591f$54a6@news.alaska-software.com:
> I assume you use HTML and XB2NET primarily for your user interface?
> SQL Express for your database? About the same here as you know I use
> a customized version of XB2NET and a homegrown ACE/ADSDBE/ORM
> combination. The application I maintained has largely be reduced to a
> processing engine that third parties are calling from .NET frontends.
> The trick was reverse engineering the WSDL and SOAP from .NET to make
> it easy and transparent for the clients.
I have a client that has done almost exactly as you. The plan was to slowly
replace all Xbase++ code with C# by using SOAP to call functions within
each language. That was about 7 years ago - they found out there are some
things better/easier to do in Xbase++, so they continue to use both tools.
Cheers,
Boris Borzic
http://xb2.net
http://sqlexpress.net
industrial strength Xbase++ development tools |
 | Allen Lee | Re: Hello
on Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:20:23 -0700On 7/20/2011 5:19 AM, Boris Borzic wrote:
> "Rodd Graham"<rgraham@grahamautomation.com> wrote in
> news:40ac469f$3c9627bb$14d11@news.alaska-software.com:
>
>> I think the 'simpler time' might have been 30 years ago when software
>> had less than 64k ram and networking required carrier tones.
>
> I don't recall that being a simpler time . We were still learning, the
> tools were not very good, and things kept changing too fast. There was
> always a sense of insecurity.
>
>> Still maintaining the legacy Xbase++ app for my client as it is just
>> too big and complex to port within their budgetary constraints.
>> Otherwise freelancing in the VB6/.NET/Delphi arenas maintaining legagy
>> projects. Nevertheless, I do miss the smaller community associated
>> with Xbase++...
>
> Although some may see it as a drawback, the smaller community definitely
> has it's advantages. For example, you know where to go in order to get
> help.
>
>> How has it been going for all of you?
>> Seeing much progress in the Xbase++ development?
>
> For me personally, things are great. I have a set of tools that I know
> quite well, are very stable and I have some control over. I'm not wasting
> time QA testing someone else's tools or learning how to do basic things.
> I think one of the smartest decisions we made about 13 yrs ago was to not
> use the Xbase++ GUI and database drivers (these were, and probably still
> are, the most problematic components). The Xbase++ compiler is great
> (multithreaded, simple, and compact). My applications are quite modern&
> easy to install and maintain - just copy exe and dll's into a folder. No
> need to install megabytes of runtime dependencies which then get modified
> by windows update and no longer work exactly the same as before. Some
> people call that progress, but then you are constantly chasing a dream.
> I remember one of those ads in the old Clipper days with the programmer
> wearing a Hawaiian shirt sitting on a beach. I have a picture of the ad
> in my mind, but don't recall who the advertiser was.
>
Hi Boris:
I remember that ad you are referring to.
Wasn't it "Programmer's Paradise" ? |
 | Boris Borzic | Re: Hello
on Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:36:44 +0200Allen Lee <lee@infopro.ca> wrote in
news:7029782e$6275fa97$f989@news.alaska-software.com:
>> I remember one of those ads in the old Clipper days with the
>> programmer wearing a Hawaiian shirt sitting on a beach. I have a
>> picture of the ad in my mind, but don't recall who the advertiser
>> was.
>>
> I remember that ad you are referring to.
> Wasn't it "Programmer's Paradise" ?
>
Yes, that's what I was thinking. I'm pretty sure the ad was in the
Programmer's Paradise catalog, just don't remember who the owner of the
ad was. Maybe it was indeed an ad for the Programmer's Paradise.
Best regards,
Boris Borzic
http://xb2.net
http://sqlexpress.net
industrial strength Xbase++ development tools |
 | Brian L. Wolfsohn | Re: Hello
on Mon, 15 Aug 2011 03:30:54 +0200Boris Borzic wrote in news:Xns9F2D4D66562F5SQLExpress@87.106.143.233:
Programmer's Paradise ??
SOunds like it might have been Brian Feldman ??
> Allen Lee <lee@infopro.ca> wrote in
> news:7029782e$6275fa97$f989@news.alaska-software.com:
>
>>> I remember one of those ads in the old Clipper days with the
>>> programmer wearing a Hawaiian shirt sitting on a beach. I have a
>>> picture of the ad in my mind, but don't recall who the advertiser
>>> was.
>>>
>> I remember that ad you are referring to.
>> Wasn't it "Programmer's Paradise" ?
>>
>
> Yes, that's what I was thinking. I'm pretty sure the ad was in the
> Programmer's Paradise catalog, just don't remember who the owner of the
> ad was. Maybe it was indeed an ad for the Programmer's Paradise.
> |
 | Clayton Jones | Re: Hello
on Fri, 19 Aug 2011 02:23:48 -0400>Programmer's Paradise ??
>SOunds like it might have been Brian Feldman ??
Brian Feldman runs Grafxsoft. I think it was PP that had that ad, but
I don't know who the owner was.
Regards,
Clayton
Clayton Jones www.cjcom.net
Top-Down Library for Xbase++
X-DBU Database Utility
X-MEMO Memo Field Replacement
NEW "X" PRODUCT (coming soon) |
 | Jose Valle | Re: Hello
on Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:36:53 +0200 |
 | Thomas Braun
 | Re: Hello
on Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:18:40 +0200Rodd Graham wrote:
> Just stopped in to say hello.
Hi Rodd  |