Author | Topic: where is BUGfix ? | |
---|---|---|
AUGE_OHR | where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 01:10:35 +0200 we have been told that on 27.05.2009 we can download v1.9.331 BUGfix "without SL1 futures", but i can not find it ? greetings by OHR Jimmy PDVD_000.jpg | |
Jan Escholt | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 06:57:46 +0200 Monday 27. may? What decade? Not this year. Jan AUGE_OHR schrieb: > we have been told that on 27.05.2009 we can download v1.9.331 BUGfix > "without SL1 futures", but i can not find it ? > > greetings by OHR > Jimmy > > > | |
AUGE_OHR | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 09:19:12 +0200 > Monday 27. may? What decade? Not this year. perhaps there was a wormhole and Time was streched from Mo-Mi 27.05.2009 ... greetings by OHR Jimmy | |
Rodd Graham | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 09:04:51 +0000 Hello AUGE_OHR, >> Monday 27. may? What decade? Not this year. >> > perhaps there was a wormhole and Time was streched from Mo-Mi > 27.05.2009 ... Personally I am glad it is not available. It is giving more time to port to Visual Studio while confirming the decision. Regards, Rodd Graham, Consultant Graham Automation Systems, LLC | |
Thomas Braun | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 13:31:03 +0200 Rodd Graham wrote: > Personally I am glad it is not available. It is giving more time to port > to Visual Studio while confirming the decision. What language - C++? (just being curious) thomas | |
Rodd Graham | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 20:39:23 +0000 Hello Thomas, >> Personally I am glad it is not available. It is giving more time to >> port to Visual Studio while confirming the decision. >> > What language - C++? (just being curious) IMO C++ is too low level for business apps. GC memory and visual form designers are requirements for me which means .NET or VB6. FWIW, I am not porting my existing Xbase++ projects but rather am porting my efforts on new projects. Xbase++ is what it is and the existing apps do what they do. Regards, Rodd Graham, Consultant Graham Automation Systems, LLC | |
mark carew | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Fri, 29 May 2009 17:22:45 +1000 Hi Rod, Have you had a look ay Gary Stephensons Oxide Transpiler. It does a very good job of converting xBase++ to c#. If you prefer VB.net. The sharpdevelop people have a free c# to vb.net and vice versa utility. I use both depending on requirements. Vs2010 beta 1.0 and .net 4.0 was released a few days ago. Regards Mark > Hello Thomas, > >>> Personally I am glad it is not available. It is giving more time to >>> port to Visual Studio while confirming the decision. >>> >> What language - C++? (just being curious) > > IMO C++ is too low level for business apps. GC memory and visual form designers > are requirements for me which means .NET or VB6. > > FWIW, I am not porting my existing Xbase++ projects but rather am porting > my efforts on new projects. Xbase++ is what it is and the existing apps > do what they do. > > Regards, > > Rodd Graham, Consultant > Graham Automation Systems, LLC | |
Steffen F. Pirsig | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 14:18:53 +0200 Jimmy, unfortunately this slide had two PDRs as outlined below. PDR-ID: 8102, Montag must read Mittwoch to match the given date PDR-ID: 8103, The date calculation 27.05.2009 didn't respect the the 2 off-days. (Thursday 21.5, Friday 22.5) Applying the PDR information to the original slide leads to the following code which in turn prints out the proper date: correct date due to 2 off-days dSL1PatchDay := CToD( "27.05.2009" ) + 2 apply golden-rule at Alaska Software (never release something on Friday) IF( DoW( dSL1PatchDay ) == 5 ) dSL1PatchDay += 2 ENDIF advance beyond next german holiday DO WHILE IsGermanHoliday( dSL1PatchDay ) dSL1PatchDay++ ENDDO ? dSL1PatchDay Alternatively you can use the following Xbase++ web-service: cSL1PatchDay := LoadFromURL( "www.alaska-software.com\nextpatchday.cxp") ? "Xbase++ SL1 patchday is:", cSL1Patchday regards Steffen "AUGE_OHR" <AUGE_OHR*AT*WEB.DE> wrote in message news:5eee30cd$53890dd5$fe2@news.alaska-software.com... > we have been told that on 27.05.2009 we can download v1.9.331 BUGfix > "without SL1 futures", but i can not find it ? > > greetings by OHR > Jimmy > > > | |
Steffen F. Pirsig | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 14:21:06 +0200 Sorry, forget to provide the IsGermanHoliday() function: FUNCTION IsGermanHoliday(dDay) LOCAL aDates := {; "20090101",; "20090106",; "20090214",; "20090223",; "20090224",; "20090225",; "20090410",; "20090412",; "20090413",; "20090501",; "20090510",; "20090521",; "20090531",; "20090601",; "20090611",; "20090808",; "20090815",; "20091003",; "20091004",; "20091031",; "20091031",; "20091101",; "20091115",; "20091118",; "20091122",; "20091129",; "20091204",; "20091206",; "20091206",; "20091213",; "20091220",; "20091224",; "20091225",; "20091226",; "20091231"} RETURN(0!=AScan(aDates,DToS(dDay))) regards Steffen "Steffen F. Pirsig" wrote in message news:74b0a65d$677f6939$2ab@news.alaska-software.com... > Jimmy, > > unfortunately this slide had two PDRs as outlined below. > > PDR-ID: 8102, Montag must read Mittwoch to match the given date > > PDR-ID: 8103, The date calculation 27.05.2009 didn't respect the > the 2 off-days. (Thursday 21.5, Friday 22.5) > > Applying the PDR information to the original slide leads to the following > code which in turn prints out the proper date: > > correct date due to 2 off-days > dSL1PatchDay := CToD( "27.05.2009" ) + 2 > > apply golden-rule at Alaska Software (never release something on > Friday) > IF( DoW( dSL1PatchDay ) == 5 ) > dSL1PatchDay += 2 > ENDIF > > advance beyond next german holiday > DO WHILE IsGermanHoliday( dSL1PatchDay ) > dSL1PatchDay++ > ENDDO > > ? dSL1PatchDay > > Alternatively you can use the following Xbase++ web-service: > > cSL1PatchDay := LoadFromURL( "www.alaska-software.com\nextpatchday.cxp") > ? "Xbase++ SL1 patchday is:", cSL1Patchday > > regards > Steffen > > "AUGE_OHR" <AUGE_OHR*AT*WEB.DE> wrote in message > news:5eee30cd$53890dd5$fe2@news.alaska-software.com... >> we have been told that on 27.05.2009 we can download v1.9.331 BUGfix >> "without SL1 futures", but i can not find it ? >> >> greetings by OHR >> Jimmy >> >> >> > | |
Wolfgang Ciriack | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 16:42:51 +0200 Hi Steffen i think you have added your personal free days to this function, i don't have so much holidays ) Regards Wolfgang <Steffen F. Pirsig> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:73ca7fef$37814092$25d@news.alaska-software.com... > Sorry, forget to provide the IsGermanHoliday() function: > > FUNCTION IsGermanHoliday(dDay) > LOCAL aDates := {; > "20090101",; > "20090106",; > "20090214",; > "20090223",; > "20090224",; > "20090225",; > "20090410",; > "20090412",; > "20090413",; > "20090501",; > "20090510",; > "20090521",; > "20090531",; > "20090601",; > "20090611",; > "20090808",; > "20090815",; > "20091003",; > "20091004",; > "20091031",; > "20091031",; > "20091101",; > "20091115",; > "20091118",; > "20091122",; > "20091129",; > "20091204",; > "20091206",; > "20091206",; > "20091213",; > "20091220",; > "20091224",; > "20091225",; > "20091226",; > "20091231"} > RETURN(0!=AScan(aDates,DToS(dDay))) > > > regards > Steffen > > > "Steffen F. Pirsig" wrote in message > news:74b0a65d$677f6939$2ab@news.alaska-software.com... >> Jimmy, >> >> unfortunately this slide had two PDRs as outlined below. >> >> PDR-ID: 8102, Montag must read Mittwoch to match the given date >> >> PDR-ID: 8103, The date calculation 27.05.2009 didn't respect the >> the 2 off-days. (Thursday 21.5, Friday 22.5) >> >> Applying the PDR information to the original slide leads to the >> following >> code which in turn prints out the proper date: >> >> correct date due to 2 off-days >> dSL1PatchDay := CToD( "27.05.2009" ) + 2 >> >> apply golden-rule at Alaska Software (never release something on >> Friday) >> IF( DoW( dSL1PatchDay ) == 5 ) >> dSL1PatchDay += 2 >> ENDIF >> >> advance beyond next german holiday >> DO WHILE IsGermanHoliday( dSL1PatchDay ) >> dSL1PatchDay++ >> ENDDO >> >> ? dSL1PatchDay >> >> Alternatively you can use the following Xbase++ web-service: >> >> cSL1PatchDay := LoadFromURL( "www.alaska-software.com\nextpatchday.cxp") >> ? "Xbase++ SL1 patchday is:", cSL1Patchday >> >> regards >> Steffen >> >> "AUGE_OHR" <AUGE_OHR*AT*WEB.DE> wrote in message >> news:5eee30cd$53890dd5$fe2@news.alaska-software.com... >>> we have been told that on 27.05.2009 we can download v1.9.331 BUGfix >>> "without SL1 futures", but i can not find it ? >>> >>> greetings by OHR >>> Jimmy >>> >>> >>> >> > | |
Rodd Graham | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 21:21:14 +0000 Hello Steffen, Now I understand why it takes years between releases! Wouldn't the function be more efficient to enumerate the working days instead? > Sorry, forget to provide the IsGermanHoliday() function: > > FUNCTION IsGermanHoliday(dDay) > LOCAL aDates := {; > "20090101",; > "20090106",; > "20090214",; > "20090223",; > "20090224",; > "20090225",; > "20090410",; > "20090412",; > "20090413",; > "20090501",; > "20090510",; > "20090521",; > "20090531",; > "20090601",; > "20090611",; > "20090808",; > "20090815",; > "20091003",; > "20091004",; > "20091031",; > "20091031",; > "20091101",; > "20091115",; > "20091118",; > "20091122",; > "20091129",; > "20091204",; > "20091206",; > "20091206",; > "20091213",; > "20091220",; > "20091224",; > "20091225",; > "20091226",; > "20091231"} > RETURN(0!=AScan(aDates,DToS(dDay))) Regards, Rodd Graham, Consultant Graham Automation Systems, LLC | |
Jan Escholt | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 19:57:46 +0200 Steffen F. Pirsig schrieb: > Alternatively you can use the following Xbase++ web-service: > > cSL1PatchDay := LoadFromURL( "www.alaska-software.com\nextpatchday.cxp") > ? "Xbase++ SL1 patchday is:", cSL1Patchday "No processor for [e:\wwwroot\nextpatchday.cxp\] found! Ignoring request!" So what does this want to tell me??? Jan | |
Steffen F. Pirsig | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Thu, 28 May 2009 21:14:49 +0200 Jan, maybe you should remove the trailing "\" from the URL - The error message simple indicates that the URL has no processor installed - no dual-core, no quad-core just No-Core - regards Steffen "Jan Escholt" wrote in message news:196c0b2a$1b8cce42$b29@news.alaska-software.com... > > > Steffen F. Pirsig schrieb: >> Alternatively you can use the following Xbase++ web-service: >> >> cSL1PatchDay := LoadFromURL( "www.alaska-software.com\nextpatchday.cxp") >> ? "Xbase++ SL1 patchday is:", cSL1Patchday > > "No processor for [e:\wwwroot\nextpatchday.cxp\] found! Ignoring request!" > So what does this want to tell me??? > > Jan | |
Thomas Braun | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Fri, 29 May 2009 10:25:54 +0200 Steffen F. Pirsig wrote: > The error message simple indicates that the URL has no processor > installed - no dual-core, no quad-core just No-Core - IMHO, this is called "virtualisation" lol thomas | |
Martin Altmann | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:08:31 +0200 Now available for download - have a look at the Alaska website! HTH, Martin ______________________________ Deutschsprachiges Xbase-Forum: http://www.xbaseforum.de/ ______________________________ | |
Rodd Graham | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:21:08 +0000 Hello Martin, > Now available for download - have a look at the Alaska website! May not matter, but I note that the SL1 posted today does not update ADSDBE or XBTools along with several other pro subscription runtime libraries. I will assume they are SL1 is backwards compatible with the prior .331 releases of these runtimes. Regards, Rodd Graham, Consultant Graham Automation Systems, LLC | |
Carlos A Beling | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:44:13 -0300 Hello: good night. Can one tell me why I am having the attached problem? Beling TIA Rodd Graham escreveu: > Hello Martin, > >> Now available for download - have a look at the Alaska website! > > May not matter, but I note that the SL1 posted today does not update > ADSDBE or XBTools along with several other pro subscription runtime > libraries. > > I will assume they are SL1 is backwards compatible with the prior .331 > releases of these runtimes. > > Regards, > > Rodd Graham, Consultant > Graham Automation Systems, LLC > > error.jpg | |
Rodd Graham | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:27:45 +0000 Hello Carlos, I had the same problem. SL1 is delivered as a patch that is dependent upon the existing 1.90.331 install. To succeed you must have the Xbase++ environment variables set per the original install and run the SL1 patch from the base folder of that install. *** Make a backup of your .331 install in case you want to revert *** Once you follow these instructions, the patch will install fine. Regards, Rodd Graham, Consultant Graham Automation Systems, LLC | |
Carlos A Beling | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:32:03 -0300 Hello Rodd: good morning. Many thanks. I have 1.90.335 and I think I do not need the patch. Beling Best regards Rodd Graham escreveu: > Hello Carlos, > > I had the same problem. SL1 is delivered as a patch that is dependent > upon the existing 1.90.331 install. > > To succeed you must have the Xbase++ environment variables set per the > original install and run the SL1 patch from the base folder of that > install. > > *** Make a backup of your .331 install in case you want to revert *** > > Once you follow these instructions, the patch will install fine. > > Regards, > > Rodd Graham, Consultant > Graham Automation Systems, LLC > > | |
AUGE_OHR | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:41:37 +0200 hi, > I will assume they are SL1 is backwards compatible with the prior .331 > releases of these runtimes. No, it is "forward" compatible i did run SL1 Code with that v355 Version "without visual Style" and all seems to work ? i can run WMI Sample which need ComEvalCollection() which is a "Futures" of SL1 ? so BIG THX to Alaska for this Version "without visual Style" which does meen that you can get a "orange" Litebar on a Tab when using XBPTABPAGE_TAB_BOTTOM which does NOT work with "full" SL1 ... greetings by OHR Jimmy | |
Donald R. Keating | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:23:45 -0400 Martin, I'm looking but, don't see anything that looks newer than the original SL1. What am I missing? >don< On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:08:31 +0200, Martin Altmann wrote: > Now available for download - have a look at the Alaska website! > > HTH, > Martin | |
Martin Altmann | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:51:25 +0200 Don, nothing!!! If you already have SL1 (because you are an active subscriber) you do not need to do anything (and - in fact - should not do anything)!!!!! This SL1 is only for those "only" being a registered user but not an active subscriber! Regards, Martin ______________________________ Deutschsprachiges Xbase-Forum: http://www.xbaseforum.de/ ______________________________ | |
Nolberto Paulino Esterell | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:23:04 -0400 Hello xpp19sl1.exe have a problem. More on Error Nolberto Paulino Regards <Martin Altmann> escribi en el mensaje news:a13130$76122b76$9448@news.alaska-software.com... > Don, > nothing!!! > If you already have SL1 (because you are an active subscriber) you do not > need to do anything (and - in fact - should not do anything)!!!!! > This SL1 is only for those "only" being a registered user but not an > active > subscriber! > > Regards, > Martin > > -- > > ______________________________ > > Deutschsprachiges Xbase-Forum: > http://www.xbaseforum.de/ > ______________________________ > xpp19sl1.JPG | |
James Loughner | Re: where is BUGfix ? on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:17:46 -0400 Do you have 1.9 installed???? If so was it installed by the original installer or by hand copying? Jim Nolberto Paulino Esterell wrote: > Hello xpp19sl1.exe have a problem. > More on Error > > Nolberto Paulino > Regards > > > > <Martin Altmann> escribió en el mensaje > news:a13130$76122b76$9448@news.alaska-software.com... >> Don, >> nothing!!! >> If you already have SL1 (because you are an active subscriber) you do not >> need to do anything (and - in fact - should not do anything)!!!!! >> This SL1 is only for those "only" being a registered user but not an >> active >> subscriber! >> >> Regards, >> Martin >> >> -- >> >> ______________________________ >> >> Deutschsprachiges Xbase-Forum: >> http://www.xbaseforum.de/ >> ______________________________ >> > > |