Author | Topic: cut and paste stuff... | |
---|---|---|
Eric Breddam | cut and paste stuff... on Fri, 14 May 2004 11:55:16 -0700 from .wishcollector... > be nice to right click and cut/copy a function or class > in the tree on the left and be able to paste it into a > different file... > ... and have that class or function moved or copied > to that file, including function bodies and such? yes - i.e. the physical text for that function or class (including methods) copied or cut/pasted... which raises something else... is there a reason there's no icon for the class definition in the tree on the left (whaddya call that window?) ... what I mean is, you can double-click on a function or method and it'll pop you over to that code, which is really nice, but there's no quick way to get to the class declaration code... | |
Joe Carrick - the Maniacc | Re: cut and paste stuff... on Fri, 14 May 2004 15:13:06 -0700 I'd also like to be able to jump to the class declaration. I think that window is called the Project Manager. Note that if you click on the Code Explorer tab at the bottom and then click on the className, you will jump to the class definition. It would seem that that could be added to the Project Manager tree as well. -Joe "Eric Breddam" <eric@somdata.com> wrote in message news:M8ExrReOEHA.5064@S15147418... > from .wishcollector... > > > be nice to right click and cut/copy a function or class > > in the tree on the left and be able to paste it into a > > different file... > > > ... and have that class or function moved or copied > > to that file, including function bodies and such? > > yes - i.e. the physical text for that function or class (including methods) > copied or cut/pasted... > > which raises something else... is there a reason there's no icon for the > class definition in the tree on the left (whaddya call that window?) ... > what I mean is, you can double-click on a function or method and it'll pop > you over to that code, which is really nice, but there's no quick way to get > to the class declaration code... > > | |
Eric Breddam | Re: cut and paste stuff... on Fri, 14 May 2004 17:20:16 -0700 > I'd also like to be able to jump to the class declaration. I think that > window is called the Project Manager. Note that if you click on the Code > Explorer tab at the bottom and then click on the className, you will jump to > the class definition. It would seem that that could be added to the Project > Manager tree as well. > Discovered that today, after posting... actually discovered how the windows can get disconnected from their positions... haven't figured out how to dock it back to where it was though... Having discovered that, I'll vote with Joe for having the class definition added to the Project Manager tree - i suppose there is some danger of everything in Code Explorer ending up in Project Manager (figured out their names today too) but... why are some things there and some things not, in the first place? what's more 'project' than 'code' about a method or a function as opposed to a class definition? | |
Till Warweg [Alaska Software] | Re: cut and paste stuff... on Mon, 17 May 2004 14:46:30 +0200 "Eric Breddam" <eric@somdata.com> wrote in message news:uBPOcHhOEHA.6380@S15147418... > > I'd also like to be able to jump to the class declaration. > > I think that window is called the Project Manager. Note > > that if you click on the Code Explorer tab at the bottom > > and then click on the className, you will jump to > > the class definition. It would seem that that could be > > added to the Project Manager tree as well. > > > Discovered that today, after posting... actually discovered > how the windows can get disconnected from their positions... > haven't figured out how to dock it back to where it was > though... > > Having discovered that, I'll vote with Joe for having the > class definition added to the Project Manager tree - i suppose > there is some danger of everything in Code Explorer ending > up in Project Manager (figured out their names today too) > but... why are some things there and some things not, in > the first place? what's more 'project' than 'code' about a > method or a function as opposed to a class definition? Eric, Joe, some good points you are raising here. It seems the way that piece of info is organized (or isn't) needs to get some more attention. I can't explain why classes don't appear in Project Manager. This makes sense. However, Project Manager displays project-related info while Code Explorer sits directly on your code, regardless of whether it's actually part of your project or not. Thus, even though much info may seem to be displayed twice at times, it's not in vain. Furthermore, Code Explorer supports options Project Manager will never have. I've made a note of this issue. Thanks for telling us. -- Regards, Till Warweg [Alaska Software] -------------------------------------------------------------------- Technical Support: support@alaska-software.com News Server: news.alaska-software.com Homepage: http://www.alaska-software.com WebKnowledgeBase: http://www.alaska-software.com/kb -------------------------------------------------------------------- |