Author | Topic: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG | |
---|---|---|
Carlos Beling | Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:24:10 -0200 Hi folks: can I work with both debuggers in the same installation? Beling TIA | |
Klemens Lichter | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:15:37 +0100 How and why? What shall it make a sense to debug a program with 2 debuggers at the same time? On the other hand, debugging either with the VX-IDE or at other time with xppdbg is no problem. Klemens "Carlos Beling" <beling@uai.com.br> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:j9U4$BjzDHA.1976@S15147418... > Hi folks: > can I work with both debuggers in the same installation? > > Beling > TIA > | |
Andreas Herdt | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:39:35 +0100 Carlos Beling wrote: > Hi folks: > can I work with both debuggers in the same installation? > > Beling > TIA Yes. Xppdbg.exe still works, allthough we are very shure that everybody who tried the VX integrated debugger won't see a reason to use the old one Another point: Time will come when xppdbg will no longer be maintained. Regards Andreas Herdt ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // // Alaska Research & Development // Homepage: www.alaska-research.com // Newsgroup: nntp://news.alaska-Software.net // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// | |
Carlos Beling | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:10:08 -0200 Hi Andreas: many thanks. I'm thinking in using it only when VX is in pre-release. Beling Happy New Year Andreas Herdt wrote: > Carlos Beling wrote: > > >>Hi folks: >>can I work with both debuggers in the same installation? >> >>Beling >>TIA > > > Yes. Xppdbg.exe still works, allthough we are very shure > that everybody who tried the VX integrated debugger won't > see a reason to use the old one > > Another point: Time will come when xppdbg will no longer > be maintained. > | |
Andreas Herdt | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:35:03 +0100 Carlos Beling wrote: > Hi Andreas: > many thanks. I'm thinking in using it only when VX is in pre-release. Yea, know what you mean. The first steamship still had sails. Just in case... > Beling > Happy New Year Same to you. Regards Andreas Herdt ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // // Alaska Research & Development // Homepage: www.alaska-research.com // Newsgroup: nntp://news.alaska-Software.net // ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// | |
Mike Evans | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:35:52 +0200 Carlos At least the debugger it's excellent, even in prerelease. After that i don't think that i will use the terminal debugger again. Regards Mike Evans "Carlos Beling" <beling@uai.com.br> wrote in message news:J%23ispVszDHA.1976@S15147418... > Hi Andreas: > many thanks. I'm thinking in using it only when VX is in pre-release. > > Beling > Happy New Year > > Andreas Herdt wrote: > > Carlos Beling wrote: > > > > > >>Hi folks: > >>can I work with both debuggers in the same installation? > >> > >>Beling > >>TIA > > > > > > Yes. Xppdbg.exe still works, allthough we are very shure > > that everybody who tried the VX integrated debugger won't > > see a reason to use the old one > > > > Another point: Time will come when xppdbg will no longer > > be maintained. > > > | |
Luciano | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:40:30 +0100 Hello Andreas, can the VX debugger only work with the projects opened or created with the VX ? Or is it possible to debug a xbase++ main.exe created out of the VX like now we do with xppdbg ? The problem that we have is that the enviroment to create our main.exe/dlls is so complex (as you probably remember) that now they can not be reproduced within the VX, but we would like to use the debugger of the VX because we suppose is better than the old one (as you said). Regards, Luciano "Andreas Herdt" <andreas.herdt@alaska-research.com> wrote in message news:GoK$gxlzDHA.1972@S15147418... > Carlos Beling wrote: > > > Hi folks: > > can I work with both debuggers in the same installation? > > > > Beling > > TIA > > Yes. Xppdbg.exe still works, allthough we are very shure > that everybody who tried the VX integrated debugger won't > see a reason to use the old one > > Another point: Time will come when xppdbg will no longer > be maintained. > > -- > Regards > > > Andreas Herdt > > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > Alaska Research & Development > Homepage: www.alaska-research.com > Newsgroup: nntp://news.alaska-Software.net > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// | |
Till Warweg | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:39:38 +0100 "Luciano" <cisnado@ipcgmbh.com> wrote in message news:jpn71aH1DHA.2016@S15147418... > Hello Andreas, > > can the VX debugger only work with the projects opened or created with the > VX ? Or is it possible to debug a xbase++ main.exe created out of the VX like > now we do with xppdbg ? (...) Luciano, you can debug any Xbase++ executable within Visual Xbase++. If you can't load your project into the IDE for the reasons you stated, try this: vx20 <yourEXE>. Another way is to use the "Open" dialog (set the file type to executable). If no project is loaded for debugging, a default project is created for you for maintaining breakpoint and other debugging session information. Regards, Till -- --------------------------------------------------- ARD - Alaska Research & Development Web: http://www.alaska-research.com Investors: http://www.alaska-research.com/tifund E-Mail: mailto:till.warweg@alaska-research.com Contact: mailto:info@alaska-research.com --------------------------------------------------- | |
Phil Ide | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:20:16 +0000 Till, > you can debug any Xbase++ executable within Visual Xbase++. ...compiled with 1.82.294 Regards, Phil Ide *************************************** * Xbase++ FAQ, Libraries and Sources: * * goto: http://www.idep.org.uk/xbase * *************************************** Spendthrift: Negative saver | |
Till Warweg | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:41:12 +0100 "Phil Ide" <phil@idep.org.uk> wrote in message news:719drbvmxrhv$.dlg@idep.org.uk... > > you can debug any Xbase++ executable within Visual Xbase++. > > ...compiled with 1.82.294 You're right. Thanks, Till -- --------------------------------------------------- ARD - Alaska Research & Development Web: http://www.alaska-research.com Investors: http://www.alaska-research.com/tifund E-Mail: mailto:till.warweg@alaska-research.com Contact: mailto:info@alaska-research.com --------------------------------------------------- | |
Luciano | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Wed, 07 Jan 2004 15:10:09 +0100 Hello Till, Thanks for your help !! The vx20 <yourEXE> works ok and the debugger is definitly much better than the old one. But after the debugger stops in the first prg, how can i set a break point in another prg ? for example like before we did it in the old debugger: we used the File/Open module command from the menu, select the desired prg and set the break point. The problem is that using the vx20 <yourEXE> it seems i do NOT HAVE all prgs at once available (as when i have an opened project), do i ? I do not want to press F10 until the desired prg is available because it can take a lot of time. I would like to run the program and go to a previous selected break point directly. Regards Luciano "Till Warweg" <till.warweg@alaska-research.com> wrote in message news:EFAu8WI1DHA.3616@S15147418... > "Luciano" <cisnado@ipcgmbh.com> wrote in message > news:jpn71aH1DHA.2016@S15147418... > > Hello Andreas, > > > > can the VX debugger only work with the projects opened or created with the > > VX ? Or is it possible to debug a xbase++ main.exe created out of the VX > like > > now we do with xppdbg ? > (...) > > Luciano, > > you can debug any Xbase++ executable within Visual Xbase++. If you > can't load your project into the IDE for the reasons you stated, try this: > > vx20 <yourEXE>. > > Another way is to use the "Open" dialog (set the file type to executable). > If no project is loaded for debugging, a default project is created for > you for maintaining breakpoint and other debugging session information. > > Regards, > Till > > -- > --------------------------------------------------- > ARD - Alaska Research & Development > > Web: http://www.alaska-research.com > Investors: http://www.alaska-research.com/tifund > E-Mail: mailto:till.warweg@alaska-research.com > Contact: mailto:info@alaska-research.com > --------------------------------------------------- > > > | |
James Loughner | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:29:01 -0500 Hi Luciano Luciano wrote: > Hello Till, > > Thanks for your help !! The vx20 <yourEXE> works ok and the debugger is > definitly much better than the old one. > > But after the debugger stops in the first prg, how can i set a break point > in another prg ? > for example like before we did it in the old debugger: we used the File/Open > module command > from the menu, select the desired prg and set the break point. The problem > is that using the vx20 <yourEXE> > it seems i do NOT HAVE all prgs at once available (as when i have an opened > project), > do i ? Yes you do just open the PRG from the explorer window and mark the new breakpoint. > > I do not want to press F10 until the desired prg is available because it can > take a lot of time. I would like > to run the program and go to a previous selected break point directly. Try the stepout option its in the menu (no hot key is defined). This will stepout of the current function. Note I agree that there needs to be some sort of coninue execution function like F5 in the old debuger. Jim > > Regards > Luciano > > > "Till Warweg" <till.warweg@alaska-research.com> wrote in message > news:EFAu8WI1DHA.3616@S15147418... > >>"Luciano" <cisnado@ipcgmbh.com> wrote in message >>news:jpn71aH1DHA.2016@S15147418... >> >>>Hello Andreas, >>> >>>can the VX debugger only work with the projects opened or created with > > the > >>>VX ? Or is it possible to debug a xbase++ main.exe created out of the VX >> >>like >> >>>now we do with xppdbg ? >> >>(...) >> >>Luciano, >> >>you can debug any Xbase++ executable within Visual Xbase++. If you >>can't load your project into the IDE for the reasons you stated, try this: >> >> vx20 <yourEXE>. >> >>Another way is to use the "Open" dialog (set the file type to executable). >>If no project is loaded for debugging, a default project is created for >>you for maintaining breakpoint and other debugging session information. >> >>Regards, >> Till >> >>-- >>--------------------------------------------------- >>ARD - Alaska Research & Development >> >>Web: http://www.alaska-research.com >>Investors: http://www.alaska-research.com/tifund >>E-Mail: mailto:till.warweg@alaska-research.com >>Contact: mailto:info@alaska-research.com >>--------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> > > > | |
Till Warweg | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:42:25 +0100 "James Loughner" <jwrl@charter.net> wrote in Message news:oPrYQuT1DHA.2012@S15147418... > > I do not want to press F10 until the desired prg is available because it can > > take a lot of time. I would like > > to run the program and go to a previous selected break point directly. > > Try the stepout option its in the menu (no hot key is defined). This > will stepout of the current function. Note I agree that there needs to > be some sort of coninue execution function like F5 in the old debuger. Sorry, folks, you've lost me here... The old debugger assigned "GO" to the F5 key. The equivalent in VX is Run -> Run <target>. This implicitly loads the executable into the debugger if debugging info had been compiled into the project. Similar to "GO", execution halts at the first breakpoint, error or QUIT . Having said all that, why is it that I have this feeling that's not what you were talking about...?? One more thing. Jim, regarding "Step Out", you are right; there's currently no shortcut key defined. However, may define your own shortcut using Tools -> Customize. Regards, Till [Alaska Research & Development] | |
James Loughner | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Wed, 07 Jan 2004 20:59:36 -0500 Hi Till Till Warweg wrote: > "James Loughner" <jwrl@charter.net> wrote in Message > news:oPrYQuT1DHA.2012@S15147418... > >>>I do not want to press F10 until the desired prg is available because it > > can > >>>take a lot of time. I would like >>>to run the program and go to a previous selected break point directly. >> >>Try the stepout option its in the menu (no hot key is defined). This >>will stepout of the current function. Note I agree that there needs to >>be some sort of coninue execution function like F5 in the old debuger. > > > Sorry, folks, you've lost me here... > > The old debugger assigned "GO" to the F5 key. The equivalent in VX > is Run -> Run <target>. This implicitly loads the executable into the > debugger if debugging info had been compiled into the project. Similar > to "GO", execution halts at the first breakpoint, error or QUIT . > > Having said all that, why is it that I have this feeling that's not what you > were talking about...?? Ok now the debugger is stopped at a break. I now want to continue running the code. How is this done? In the old debugger F5 would start execution from the break. Run restarts the execution from the beginning. Some times I would like to move through a loop. ie FOR I = 1 TO big number ALTD() break doalotofstuff NEXT I In the old debugger F5 would strat the program and then stop again at the break so I could examine values. I don't want to have to step through the doalotofstuff code. > > One more thing. Jim, regarding "Step Out", you are right; there's currently > no shortcut key defined. However, may define your own shortcut using > Tools -> Customize. I figured that out. I used CTRL-F5 > > Regards, > Till > [Alaska Research & Development] > > | |
Luciano Cisnado | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:14:20 +0100 Hello Till, James is totally right, we need the same functionality like the F5 in the old debugger. I agree. His explanation is very good. Regards Luciano "James Loughner" <jwrl@charter.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:NEwREtY1DHA.3616@S15147418... > > Hi Till > > Till Warweg wrote: > > "James Loughner" <jwrl@charter.net> wrote in Message > > news:oPrYQuT1DHA.2012@S15147418... > > > >>>I do not want to press F10 until the desired prg is available because it > > > > can > > > >>>take a lot of time. I would like > >>>to run the program and go to a previous selected break point directly. > >> > >>Try the stepout option its in the menu (no hot key is defined). This > >>will stepout of the current function. Note I agree that there needs to > >>be some sort of coninue execution function like F5 in the old debuger. > > > > > > Sorry, folks, you've lost me here... > > > > The old debugger assigned "GO" to the F5 key. The equivalent in VX > > is Run -> Run <target>. This implicitly loads the executable into the > > debugger if debugging info had been compiled into the project. Similar > > to "GO", execution halts at the first breakpoint, error or QUIT . > > > > Having said all that, why is it that I have this feeling that's not what you > > were talking about...?? > > Ok now the debugger is stopped at a break. I now want to continue > running the code. How is this done? In the old debugger F5 would start > execution from the break. Run restarts the execution from the beginning. > Some times I would like to move through a loop. ie > > FOR I = 1 TO big number > ALTD() break > doalotofstuff > NEXT I > > In the old debugger F5 would strat the program and then stop again at > the break so I could examine values. I don't want to have to step > through the doalotofstuff code. > > > > > > One more thing. Jim, regarding "Step Out", you are right; there's currently > > no shortcut key defined. However, may define your own shortcut using > > Tools -> Customize. > > I figured that out. I used CTRL-F5 > > > > > Regards, > > Till > > [Alaska Research & Development] > > > > > | |
Till Warweg | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:00:28 +0100 Jim, please note that I've just realised that I misspelled the command name in my last post: "The equivalent in VX is Run -> Run <target>" should actually read "The equivalent in VX is Run -> DEBUG <target>". Sorry about that. > Ok now the debugger is stopped at a break. I now want to continue > running the code. How is this done? Just press F9 (Debug <target>) again. > Some times I would like to move through a loop. ie > > FOR I = 1 TO big number > ALTD() break > doalotofstuff > NEXT I > > In the old debugger F5 would strat the program and then stop again at > the break so I could examine values. I don't want to have to step > through the doalotofstuff code. Please let's be clear on this: F9 doesn't in your case?? Debug <target> should behave exactly the same as "GO" in the text mode debugger in that respect. I've just debugged the code snippet you sent and execution stopped on ALTD() each time I hit F9? Same behaviour with normal breakpoints. > (Tools -> Customize) > I figured that out. I used CTRL-F5 Regards, Till -- --------------------------------------------------- ARD - Alaska Research & Development Web: http://www.alaska-research.com Investors: http://www.alaska-research.com/tifund E-Mail: mailto:till.warweg@alaska-research.com Contact: mailto:info@alaska-research.com --------------------------------------------------- | |
James Loughner | Re: Visual debugger versus XPPDBG on Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:27:27 -0500 Ok Till, but that was not obvious to me. I'll try it. Jim Till Warweg wrote: > Jim, > > please note that I've just realised that I misspelled the command > name in my last post: > > "The equivalent in VX is Run -> Run <target>" should actually read > "The equivalent in VX is Run -> DEBUG <target>". > > Sorry about that. > > >>Ok now the debugger is stopped at a break. I now want to continue >>running the code. How is this done? > > > Just press F9 (Debug <target>) again. > > >>Some times I would like to move through a loop. ie >> >>FOR I = 1 TO big number >> ALTD() break >> doalotofstuff >>NEXT I >> >>In the old debugger F5 would strat the program and then stop again at >>the break so I could examine values. I don't want to have to step >>through the doalotofstuff code. > > > Please let's be clear on this: F9 doesn't in your case?? > Debug <target> should behave exactly the same as "GO" in the text > mode debugger in that respect. I've just debugged the code snippet > you sent and execution stopped on ALTD() each time I hit F9? > Same behaviour with normal breakpoints. > > >>(Tools -> Customize) >>I figured that out. I used CTRL-F5 > > > > > Regards, > Till > > -- > --------------------------------------------------- > ARD - Alaska Research & Development > > Web: http://www.alaska-research.com > Investors: http://www.alaska-research.com/tifund > E-Mail: mailto:till.warweg@alaska-research.com > Contact: mailto:info@alaska-research.com > --------------------------------------------------- > > > |