Author | Topic: WAA 2.0 | |
---|---|---|
Allen Lee | WAA 2.0 on Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:46:11 -0700 Hi Everyone: I am a developer that only uses WAA 1.9 because web apps are my preferred delivery platform. I have read with interest the many varied issues with Xbase++ 2.0 reported by developers in this forum. 1. What has been the experience of anyone who creates web apps with the new 2.0 CXP software? 3. What has the conversion from WAA 1.9 code been like? 4. What is the motive to upgrade to 2.0 when I can do everything in 1.9? | |
Thomas Braun | Re: WAA 2.0 on Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:57:15 +0100 Allen Lee wrote: > 1. What has been the experience of anyone who creates web apps with the > new 2.0 CXP software? I don't use cxp so can't comment on that But where is your point 2.??? > 3. What has the conversion from WAA 1.9 code been like? Basically I just compiled everything... done! > 4. What is the motive to upgrade to 2.0 when I can do everything in 1.9? I wanted to switch to a Windows 2012 server running in a VM and 1.9 WAA didn't even start on Win 2012. regards Thomas | |
Allen Lee | Re: WAA 2.0 on Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:51:55 -0700 Thank you, Thomas, the missing point 2 is: 2. The desktop (Xbase++) apps only run on a network while the web (WAA) apps run from any device that has an internet connection. Why would a developer choose to create desktop applications over web applications? On 3/24/2015 12:57 AM, "Thomas Braun" wrote: > Allen Lee wrote: > >> 1. What has been the experience of anyone who creates web apps with the >> new 2.0 CXP software? > > I don't use cxp so can't comment on that > > But where is your point 2.??? > >> 3. What has the conversion from WAA 1.9 code been like? > > Basically I just compiled everything... done! > >> 4. What is the motive to upgrade to 2.0 when I can do everything in 1.9? > > I wanted to switch to a Windows 2012 server running in a VM and 1.9 WAA > didn't even start on Win 2012. > > regards > Thomas > | |
Thomas Braun | Re: WAA 2.0 on Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:08:41 +0100 Allen Lee wrote: > 2. The desktop (Xbase++) apps only run on a network while the web (WAA) > apps run from any device that has an internet connection. > Why would a developer choose to create desktop applications over web > applications? Some applications might have security reasons, speed might be an issue as well. Web applications are sometimes not very user friendly and if they are, it adds massive complexity to the code. Thomas | |
Thomas Braun | Re: WAA 2.0 on Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:37:19 +0100 Thomas Braun wrote: > Web applications are sometimes not very user friendly and if they are, it > adds massive complexity to the code. Or, if you decide to not code the UI stuff yourself, you have to use tons of 3rd party components (jQuery et al) that bloat the whole thing quite significantly and makes it hard to track down bugs. Thomas |