Author | Topic: What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? | |
---|---|---|
CCH | What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? on Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:25:24 +0800 Hi I am conducting a poll as above at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. This is to enable me to determine the future contents of the newly revived Clipper... Clipper... Clipper. TQ CCH http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com | |
CCH | Re: What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:13:05 +0800 Hi I recall reading somewhere in one of Xbase++ newsgroup that 25,000 copies has been sold However, the latest result at Clipper.. Clipper... Clipper (http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com) as at today, is that out of 98 votes, 38 was from Xbase ++ "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1779deba$1db61d37$1b2@news.alaska-software.com... > Hi > > I am conducting a poll as above at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. > This is to enable me to determine the future contents of the newly revived > Clipper... Clipper... Clipper. > > > TQ > > > CCH > http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com > > | |
Chris Andries | Re: What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:25:51 +0100 This means that at this time only 38 of all the professional Xbase++ programmers found the time to vote on your site. Any other conclusion is very hypothetical. By the way, most of them don't like cross-posting on the webboard. Regards, Chris Andries. "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:6aa1a929$38058c47$9c6@news.alaska-software.com... > Hi > > I recall reading somewhere in one of Xbase++ newsgroup that 25,000 copies > has been sold > > However, the latest result at Clipper.. Clipper... Clipper > (http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com) as at today, is that out of 98 votes, 38 > was from Xbase ++ > > "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1779deba$1db61d37$1b2@news.alaska-software.com... > > Hi > > > > I am conducting a poll as above at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. > > This is to enable me to determine the future contents of the newly revived > > Clipper... Clipper... Clipper. > > > > > > TQ > > > > > > CCH > > http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com > > > > > > | |
Jan Escholt | Re: What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:35:36 +0100 Chris, I think you are right. Most people to not react on postings that have been published 5 (!) times. They assume this as suspect or spam. Jan Chris Andries schrieb: > This means that at this time only 38 of all the professional Xbase++ > programmers found the time to vote on your site. Any other conclusion is > very hypothetical. > > By the way, most of them don't like cross-posting on the webboard. > > Regards, > Chris Andries. > > "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:6aa1a929$38058c47$9c6@news.alaska-software.com... >> Hi >> >> I recall reading somewhere in one of Xbase++ newsgroup that 25,000 copies >> has been sold >> >> However, the latest result at Clipper.. Clipper... Clipper >> (http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com) as at today, is that out of 98 votes, 38 >> was from Xbase ++ >> >> "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:1779deba$1db61d37$1b2@news.alaska-software.com... >>> Hi >>> >>> I am conducting a poll as above at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. >>> This is to enable me to determine the future contents of the newly > revived >>> Clipper... Clipper... Clipper. >>> >>> >>> TQ >>> >>> >>> CCH >>> http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com >>> >>> >> > > > | |
CCH | Re: What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:17 +0800 Hi I recall reading somewhere in one of Xbase++ newsgroup that 25,000 copies has been sold However, the latest result at Clipper.. Clipper... Clipper (http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com) as at today, is that out of 98 votes, 38 was from Xbase ++ ... "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1779deba$1db61d37$1b2@news.alaska-software.com... > Hi > > I am conducting a poll as above at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. > This is to enable me to determine the future contents of the newly revived > Clipper... Clipper... Clipper. > > > TQ > > > CCH > http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com > > | |
Jan Escholt | Re: What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:33:59 +0100 Maybe you have a keyboard problem. All your messages are postet at least twice. Jan CCH schrieb: > Hi > > I recall reading somewhere in one of Xbase++ newsgroup that 25,000 copies > has been sold > > However, the latest result at Clipper.. Clipper... Clipper > (http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com) as at today, is that out of 98 votes, 38 > was from Xbase ++ ... > > > "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1779deba$1db61d37$1b2@news.alaska-software.com... >> Hi >> >> I am conducting a poll as above at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. >> This is to enable me to determine the future contents of the newly revived >> Clipper... Clipper... Clipper. >> >> >> TQ >> >> >> CCH >> http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com >> >> > > > | |
CCH | Re: What is your favourite 32-bit Clipper-compatible Compiler ? on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:59:06 +0800 Hi Jan Sincere apologies for the apparent multi-postings I had some problems in logging in to the news server "Jan Escholt" <jan@escholt.de> wrote in message news:dc3b996$59c97717$9fb@news.alaska-software.com... > Maybe you have a keyboard problem. All your messages are postet at least > twice. > > Jan > > CCH schrieb: >> Hi >> >> I recall reading somewhere in one of Xbase++ newsgroup that 25,000 copies >> has been sold >> >> However, the latest result at Clipper.. Clipper... Clipper >> (http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com) as at today, is that out of 98 votes, >> 38 was from Xbase ++ ... >> >> >> "CCH" <cch4ktb@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:1779deba$1db61d37$1b2@news.alaska-software.com... >>> Hi >>> >>> I am conducting a poll as above at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. >>> This is to enable me to determine the future contents of the newly >>> revived Clipper... Clipper... Clipper. >>> >>> >>> TQ >>> >>> >>> CCH >>> http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com >>> >>> >> >> >> > |